dt 1990 vs hd58x

It is very clear and detailed, though. Sennheiser HD6XX, HD600, HD58X Jubilee Sony WH-1000XM3 Schiit Asgard 3/ Modius (black) Share This Post Reactions: Reputator and Wilashort. I haven't heard nor measured the DT177x. Overall though, I would say they have better clarity and resolve and a slightly larger soundstage, but nothing crazy. In the case of these three you mentioned if you want a better 58x definitely go the Sundara as its another balanced headphone and very similar to the 58x just… well… better imo. I’m looking at the 1990s and Sundara but I do game quite frequently (FPS). Edit: What is AutoEQ? New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. Leave a comment down below :), Clicky shady link is not very welcoming! I had the HD58X, HD598, DT990 and DT1990. In our case, Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro has a much better rate as its frequency response is 5 Hz - 35 kHz. 1990s still maintains that V signature just not as potent as the 990s its smoother its one of those you will more than likely have to try for yourself to know if you like it so I can’t recommend it. Just to clarify, velour is known to be more open with less isolation compared to pleather. Oh sorry, I thought onedrive links are fairly common. Its probably a very distinct but refined Beyerdynamic sound if you know and like it. Also gotta remember that you can snag a sundara for $250 meanwhile your looking at $400 and up for a dt 1990. pretty large difference in price brackets there and would probably go head to head in price margin with the ananda instead of the sundara. Granted, I don’t believe I’m particularly treble-sensitive. Nothing mush has jumped out at me as particularly exciting or noteworthy about the Sundaras–they’re just all around pleasant and easy to listen to. Which is why I tried to make the point about aggressive sort of voicing, since if you’re into that I think it’s worth thinking a little harder about spending the extra money on the Beyers. As the DT 1990 shares the same driver with the Amiron and DT 1770 a direct comparison is logical. They sound detailed, but not particularly sibilant. It was like having a lot of informations, but coming in a block from a acute angle without much separation. Sundaras are more laid back, but not so much so as Sennheiser 650/6xx. www.sparicilandini.com. Home; About Us. Just be weary that hifiman does have some quality control issues here and there definitely check out your product for any faulty crap…, yea,that is what i want…only a little bit more treble and spark,not piercing or sibilant because im sensitive when it comes to much highs…i only need a little bit more from my hd58x,I dont need lots of bass and highs,because I mostly enjoy middrange,and when i listen to music i mostly focus on his vocals…and yea i tried the hd 660s,but they aint cutting it for the price difference…and yea I eqed the hd58x to my liking,but there is always a limit to where you can go…, Gotcha, so I can recommend the sundara pretty easily to you as long as you consider that the vocals are not as intimate / forward but still very much present, it’s timbre is planar altho still very natural and extra clean and it’s not warm. very detailed and exciting, punches Waaaaaay above its price 180$. It's a safe link, that domain is owned by Microsoft and leads to OneDrive. I can’t really find the 1990 for less than 550 so if they are close’ish maybe I’ll save the $200. In both cases it also depends on the pads. beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro, Black (Dt1990 ... beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro, Black (Dt1990 (Renewed) $499.00: Get the deal: Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro 250 Ohm Open-Bac... Beyerdynamic DT 990 Pro 250 Ohm Open-Back Studio Mixing Headphones Bundle -Includes- Soft Case, Headphone Splitter, and More: Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, SMSL 10th MK II -> SMSL SP200 -> Focal Elegia, DT1990 / HD600 / HD595 / Dunu Titan 5 / T2 Pro, DT-1990+D Elite Hybrid / G6 + SMSL M300 M2 / Tube01 + Asgard 3, SMSL M6 > JDSL Atom > HD800 SDR / HD58X / HE4XX / ER2XR / BL-03. Of course, though budget is a function of one’s individual means and priorities. DT 1990 Pro has enough low end frequency for the "fun" factor and very clear high end frequency for clarity. I still think it’s a little airy for what I like from immersive play, but I’m finding it more enjoyable for music. The HD6XX is also a good option. I'd get the 58x and enjoy the advantage and excellent sound it gives you. If you’d prefer a more relaxed sound and overall very competent performance for a good price, Sundaras would be the way to go. Out of everything I own they’re one of the best things going for aggressive music like metal, hard rock, etc. Some will prefer the DT177X others the DT1990. I live in Canada, so some of the shipping issues which others may not face are listed nonetheless. They’re pretty silky and smooth. Did you ever try the Sundaras for gaming? Just got Sundaras in, and have had 1990s for a minute (also own 58x), so I finally feel equipped to chime in. The DT 1990 bass is better extended and has less emphasis/coloration and is a bit closer to neutral while retaining the slightly warm signature. Beyerdynamic The DT1990 Pro ($599, £471, AU$1,159) is an open-back design, so it doesn't hush external noise, but … I can clearly hear where things are coming from. Today we have two open-back contenders going head-to-head. I figure anyone shopping for headphones can make their own call about how much they’re comfortable spending on a pair of headphones in general and whether the price difference between Sundara and 1990s is a more important concern than getting something with a sound signature that might cater to their tastes better. I do have experience with beyers and so far they all can be sibilant, agreed in that case definitely the Sundara it’s all around better. Below the Left and Right response of a stock HD58X when driven by a Kameleon amp. HD559, HD598 are lighter and wont bother you while gaming, and still provide crucial sound info. On the other hand, sound-wise, the Sennheiser are slightly better and have less harmonic distortion, but this might not be audible for most. never heard the 1990 so can’t help u there. Very similar headphones, hd660s costs alot more. It nay be the best headphone for competitive gaming there is. There thus is no 'universal' filter. This is what these filters do they remove… The new revision of the Sundara is apparently really really good and should be closer to the sound of the 58X with a bit more treble and more bass extension, also it’s cheaper than the 1990’s, but the 1990’s are built better. A more elaborate report of this headphone can be downloaded HERE in pdf format with more measurements and experiments on the HD58X Jubilee. they are not detail monsters, but have sparkle and bass in more of a “fun” tuning then analytical. Thank you both for the response, that’s really helpful. Hi guys,this is my very first review: https://1drv.ms/w/s!As-gJ-WlszWt3V_kRov01R8AiAOP?e=BkJttc, Any questions or suggestions? Played some Fleetwood Mac earlier. However, other reviews warn of the elevated treble, something that seems borne out by measurements like these from Solderdude. DT990 pro vs Sennheiser HD58x vs Fidelio X2HR. Not sure which to go for. Also 1990s are definitely in a higher price bracket more often than not compared to the sundara… you can get a good Sundara for $350 and if you go to Head-Fi you can pick one up for around $200-$250. I’ve been using the Sundara for gaming (csgo) and imo it performs very well. The mod isn't hugely changing. Passive filters can ONLY attenuate. Less fatiguing then the DT990 Pro. home latest update: Feb-16-2021 Each filter is purpose made for a specific headphone (see list below) and can NOT be used for other headphones. Below the HD58X (modified) versus stock HD58X via Kameleon. It’s treble is better, altho the 58x might still be smoother sounding while the sundara could get a bit fatiguing. DT1990 is great for solo games and casual shooters like BF4, BF1, Killing Floor2, etc.. those games where you can relax between spawns, take off headphones if needed and just not playing to win. Having compared both of them, I mostly agree, except for the 1990 layering which was really disappointing IMHO (not that the 58X was better, but it's 1/3 of the price). But comparing to DT 770 Pro and HD 58X as the title stated, HD … But it’s hard to argue they’re worth spending $200 more than Sundara. Be glad you didn't go with the Dt 1990, that one underwhelmed me even in direct comparison to much cheaper (<150€ cheap) headphones like the DT 880 and AKG K702. If your musical tastes trend toward loud and aggressive music, I think the 1990s would be a clearly better choice. I lucked into a clearance pair at $409, and at that price I might push the 1990 harder. I've seen a lot of complimentary reviews of the DT 1990, some of which claim that it's a relatively neutral headphone in the vein of an HD 600 but with better extended bass and better soundstage. The only thing that the DT1990 really shines in is the amazing fast driver, it was very nice for metal, fast decay on the reverb. The Sennheiser HD 58X Jubilee and the Beyerdynamic DT 990 PRO are two very good critical listening open-back headphones but shine in different categories. The Sennheiser HD58X (from personal experience) is not that good of a value. Dec 6, 2010 at 1:26 PM. That sounds like a good plan. When it comes to low end hmmmm yeah the sundara i would say has better bass, less boomy but nice tight and impactful. They’re a better technical headphone, but also more expensive. A place for discussion, news, reviews and DIY projects related to portable audio, headphones, headphone amplifiers and DACs. The Beyerdynamic DT1990 Pro headphone. The sundara sounds pretty nice, but will be more neutral than warm like the senn. It was like having a lot of informations, but coming in a block from a acute angle without much separation. If you are looking for more aggressive treble it might not be the one for you. Cookies help us deliver our Services. Powered by Discourse, best viewed with JavaScript enabled. Thanks. The hd660s is right there with it. meze neo/noir could work as well. You'll get better bass response, and fuller low-mids, which will improve instrument timbre, and fill them out more. Some people might be concerned about the whole velour vs pleather thing and based on the performance and comfort I wouldn’t worry about that. The 1990s are a very aggressive headphone. Wow, the DT 1990 Pro has surpassed all expectations. https://1drv.ms/w/s!As-gJ-WlszWt3V_kRov01R8AiAOP?e=BkJttc. HD 58x: Pros Detachable cables, Better mids, Works optimally even without amp, Cons Shipping fees/Massdrop in general, High clamping force, Relatively narrow soundstage. Habe die 990 DT Pro 250Ohm Variante Nebenbei: Es macht schon Sinn in den Windows Einstellungen Audio von 48khz auf 96khz zu stellen oder? The DT 1990 Pro also has a treble peak but at a lower frequency (8kHz). I have hd 58x,and i love them,but i just need a little bit more spark in high end,and little more in low end…what would you recoomend under 500…i was thinking about hifiman sundara or beyerdynamic but idk,wanna hear you advice…and i dont have a sound preference,because the only headphones that i listened in my life were mostly iems,k712pro,and hd 650,6xx,58x…and yeah dont give me some fostex advice,i dont have strong enought amp for that. I prefer it with the Harman eq. The imaging of the hd58x allows you to pinpoint sounds better than any headphone ive tried. In your review, you mention you want something in-between the HD58X and The DT-1990 Analytical... that's easy, change the pads to the Balanced. It can sound rather congested in busy tracks, the soundstage and imaging is rather narrow, detail wise falls flat compared to the DT880, and is not very engaging, almost dull sounding. but the 58x and the sundara are two of my favorite headphones ever. Thanks for the initial opinions. Prices have been varying quite a bit lately–I managed to snag mine for $409, but every time I’ve looked recently prices are north of $500. I did eventually give it a go, and it didn’t have the bass involvement I’d like for immersive play–probably dynamics are better for that? They’re more apt to reveal when a recording has too much treble than they are to make good recordings sound bad, if that makes sense. Incidentally, it has broken in since my original fresh-out-of-the-box listening experiences, and now sounds fuller and more engaging. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. beyerdynamic DT 1990 Pro Open Studio Headphones. If you care more about comfort and build quality, the Beyerdynamic will be a better option. But I listen to both a lot and liked the DT 1990 … "HD58X: outer foam removed + felt mod + Harman eq from u/oratory1990"Does Oratory have an EQ for the 58X with felt mod? post-13521967. This was an upgrade for me (coming from the 1990s may have a bit too much high end for your taste. If you want more spark in the highs you will get it, great smooth treble too other headphones with more treble i think the sundara is one of the only headphones i’ve tried with both great treble AND smooth treble. If you're using his 58X EQ and have the felt mod... that EQ is not going to achieve quite the desired effect. 58x is considerably warmer sounding but the sundara is surprisingly neutral. I would say tho the impact is completely different in general, i assume because planar vs dynamic, The new Helios from HarmonicDyne is really good. What amp do you have? Thanks! I think that's why I absolutly hated the 1990 for competitive gaming. W shaped bright. You can definitely hear where the sound is coming from which direction, so you can still play FPS games with it without a problem even though the sound stage is so so. Press J to jump to the feed. To me, 1990s teeter on the brink of excessive treble without ever quite crossing over the line. The DT 1990's are almost the opposite, have deeper bass, more forward treble, but the midrange can sound a bit recessed, especially compared to the HD 650, and a more exciting forward presentation. Having compared both of them, I mostly agree, except for the 1990 layering which was really disappointing IMHO (not that the 58X was better, but it's 1/3 of the price). I think that's why I absolutly hated the 1990 for competitive gaming. I will try to write it in post now. I also love the 1990s for their staging abilities for competitive style gaming (I’ve not tried Sundaras yet). The drivers differ as well. DT990 Pro: To my knowledge the 1990 are tough for treble sensitive people so I would go with the sundara. It didn’t dethrone 1990 for me for competitive style, but I’d take @ericg’s word that it gets the job done. 1990 has much much higher treble and highs they also respond decently well to eq so I think you will be fine. Did you ever try the Sundaras for gaming? imo, Would be better if you write your review in the post. The HD58X can be used with the Kameleon fitted with a HD58X module. No contest. Get the DT880s. There are reviews out there that mid can use some more love, but its good enough in that zone too. I have hd 58x,and i love them,but i just need a little bit more spark in high end,and little more in low end…what would you recoomend under 500…i was thinking about hifiman sundara or beyerdynamic but idk,wanna hear you advice…and i dont have a sound preference,because the only headphones that i listened in my life were mostly iems,k712pro,and hd 650,6xx,58x…and yeah dont … Advertisement & Sponsorship; Add Your Blog/Social Physical comfort aside, with my DT 1990’s if I didn’t EQ and didn’t watch my volume levels closely, I would sometimes end up with an aching right ear after an extended listening session. DarkEnergy. they have a bit of a v shape and easy to drive. I'll have another look at the layering. dude thank you so much, I'm going to edit my review now. Hd58x for gaming. Customized 50mm German-Engineered Dynamic Driver, High-Definition Audio Performance, Walnut Housing | Check out 'HarmonicDyne Helios Dynamic Headphone' on Indiegogo. They’re a notch above the 58x and Sundaras in technicalities, and build quality is absolutely solid. The most expensive offering in Beyerdynamic’s DT line will take on a mid-level opponent from Sennheiser’s HD line: the 660 S.While not exactly the same price, the DT 1990 can occasionally be found on sale for $500 or less, landing both of these headphones in the “mid-level” audiophile category. HD 6XX has very good imaging. Dal 1963 Grandi Vini di Verona Custoza - Lugana-Bar. I’m listening to some loungy stuff on them today. May 31, 2017 at 4:13 PM. The treble/clarity is higher than HD58X and the treble peak on the DT1990 is higher than that of the 400i DT77x has more bass than all the mentioned ones. (Substantial) peaks in frequency response are far more sound degrading than dips.

Cabbage Patch Adoptimals Commercial, Coordinate Translation Calculator Math, Bunnings Polyurethane Sealant, Storkcraft Princess 4-in-1 Convertible Crib Pink, Domestic Violence Documentary 2020, Deborah Allison Married To Davey Allison, Mass Most Wanted Captured, 50 Disposable Face Mask,